ThinLinc: A Highly Compatible and Tested Alternative to X2Go

ThinLinc as an alternative to X2Go illustration

When it comes to remote desktop solutions for Linux servers, ThinLinc stands out for its compatibility and performance, especially compared to X2Go. ThinLinc is specifically optimized and tested across the most popular Linux distributions, providing a reliable experience for users who require robust remote access.

Compatibility and Reliability

Several users have highlighted the challenges they’ve faced with X2Go, particularly when dealing with certain desktop environments like GNOME on Red Hat or encountering specific application-related issues. For instance, one user noted, “I had some display issues with X2Go, but ThinLinc works perfectly.” This kind of feedback underscores ThinLinc’s reliability, especially in scenarios where X2Go struggles.

Another testimonial points out that “X2Go isn’t fully compatible with newer desktop environments like TigerVNC on Red Hat, leading to some unresolved problems.” In contrast, ThinLinc’s rigorous testing across major Linux distributions ensures it operates smoothly, making it a more dependable choice for those who require seamless remote desktop sessions.

Performance and User Experience

Performance is another area where ThinLinc excels. A user who initially used X2Go on an Ubuntu MATE desktop environment mentioned that X2Go “has some issues and development on it seems to have slowed.” After switching to ThinLinc, they found that “the client works really well,” ultimately deciding to purge X2Go from their server.

In educational and research settings, ThinLinc is also noted for its ease of use and lower troubleshooting demands. One testimonial mentioned, “Our researchers use SSH and X2Go, but ThinLinc just works better out of the box and causes fewer problems, especially for educational purposes.”

Considerations for Transition

While X2Go remains a solid option, particularly for certain use cases, ThinLinc is often viewed as a superior alternative due to its broader compatibility, better performance in problematic scenarios, and consistent updates. One user, while comparing solutions, stated, “X2Go is a fine product, but I’ve been using ThinLinc on another system, and it is a superior solution.”

Overall, if you’re encountering issues with X2Go or are looking for a remote desktop solution that integrates seamlessly with the major Linux distributions, ThinLinc offers a compelling alternative. Its ability to handle a variety of scenarios that may pose challenges for X2Go makes it a strong contender for those considering a switch.

Real User Testimonials

The text above is based on real user testimonials, which provide firsthand experiences and insights:

1. On Compatibility and Performance:
   • “I had some display issues for some specific programs with X2Go, but ThinLinc works perfectly. So this could be a very good option for all (12) servers.”
   • “X2Go isn’t fully compatible with newer desktop environments like TigerVNC on Red Hat, leading to some unresolved problems.”
   • “Interesting observation: X2Go is apparently too outdated to run the TigerVNC client. So, the compatibility with applications and desktop environments might not be great among the FreeNX-related tools.”
2. On Ease of Use and Reliability:
   • “I installed the server side on an Ubuntu MATE desktop environment originally using it remote via X2Go. But X2Go has some issues and development on it seems to have slowed. Thus my test with ThinLinc. Your client works really well and I have purged X2Go on the server.”
   • “Our researchers use SSH (sometimes with X11 forwarding) and/or X2Go. But ThinLinc just works better out of the box and gives fewer problems, so especially for the educational part this is really convenient.”
   • “Thanks for the explanation, that really helps. At this time our researchers use SSH (sometimes with X11 forwarding) and/or X2Go. But ThinLinc just works a bit better out of the box and gives less problems, so especially for the educational part this is really convenient I think. Maybe we start there and see where it goes.”
3. On Transition Considerations:
   • “X2Go is a fine product, but I’ve been using ThinLinc on another system, and it is a superior solution.”
   • “Before they were using X2Go and were not satisfied with X2Go issues. They are satisfied with ThinLinc.”
   • “Up to now we use X2Go, but we encounter some problems that I can’t resolve simply. Therefore we consider switching to another remote desktop solution.”
   • “For the moment, nothing is official, and I’m scouting for a replacement for X2Go in our company. I’m evaluating all aspects of your solution in order to make my choice. From what I can see, I’m going to propose your solution for integration into our services in October.”
   • “It does appear to be a robust alternative to Xrdp and X2Go (…). I am a hobbyist and home user. Thank you for the opportunity to use your applications. I will continue to use and compare.”

These testimonials provide real-world examples of how ThinLinc has been preferred over X2Go in various scenarios.

Further Reading and Community Discussion

For more detailed insights into ThinLinc and its performance compared to X2Go, check out these resources:

1. Personal ThinLinc Use Case and Performance Comparison: Read the discussion on our community forum where users share their experiences with ThinLinc and X2go.
2. Video Overview of ThinLinc: Watch a comprehensive YouTube video that dives into ThinLinc’s features and how it compares to X2go and SSH-X.
3. Join the Discussion: Continue the conversation and share your thoughts on our community forum where we discuss all things related to ThinLinc, X2Go, and other remote desktop solutions.